Part of the Risk Runners network
Arizona Captive Insurance

Regulatory Compliance

Demonstrating adherence to Arizona captive insurance requirements for the dental syndicate.

Regulatory Requirements

The dental captive syndicate meets or exceeds all Arizona captive insurance regulatory thresholds.

🔀

Risk Distribution

12 independent dentists across 4 specialties ensure adequate risk distribution. No single practice represents more than 15% of total premium volume.

🏦

Capitalization

$1M initial capitalization—4x the regulatory minimum. Conservative investment strategy preserves capital while generating modest returns.

📈

Actuarial Soundness

Less than 1% probability of ruin across 5,000 Monte Carlo simulation runs. Solvency ratio maintained above 2.5x throughout the projection period.

Detailed Compliance Analysis

Mapping the dental captive against specific Arizona Revised Statutes governing captive insurance.

⚖️ Risk Distribution — A.R.S. § 20-1098.01

Adequate risk distribution across independent insureds

  • 12 independent dental practices
  • 4 distinct specialties (General, Orthodontics, Periodontics, Oral Surgery)
  • Geographic distribution across Arizona metro areas
Status
✅ Compliant

Exceeds minimum risk distribution requirements with 12 unrelated insureds across multiple specialties.

🏦 Minimum Capital — A.R.S. § 20-1098.02

Capital and surplus requirements for captive insurers

  • $1M initial capitalization (4x regulatory minimum)
  • 2.8x solvency ratio at formation
  • Conservative investment policy preserving capital
Status
✅ Compliant

Initial capital of $1M significantly exceeds the $250K statutory minimum for group captives.

📄 Feasibility Study — A.R.S. § 20-1098.03

Requirement for a comprehensive feasibility study prior to formation

  • This website IS the feasibility study rendered in code
  • Monte Carlo simulations with 5,000 runs
  • Claims modeling, financial projections, and risk analysis
Status
✅ Compliant

Comprehensive feasibility study with actuarial modeling, risk analysis, and financial projections—all rendered as a live, auditable codebase.

💰 Pro Forma Financials — A.R.S. § 20-1098.05

Three-year pro forma financial projections

  • Year 1: Establishment, initial premium collection, reserve building
  • Year 2: Stabilization, experience rating adjustments, claims development
  • Year 3: Maturation, dividend potential, reinsurance optimization
Status
✅ Compliant

Three-year projections demonstrate sustained solvency, growing surplus, and positive operating results.

Additional Considerations

🏜️

Domicile Selection

Arizona offers a mature captive insurance regulatory framework with competitive fees, experienced regulators, and a growing captive community—ideal for a dental syndicate.

📊

Tax Considerations

The captive qualifies for 831(b) micro-captive election, allowing up to $2.65M in annual premiums to be taxed only on investment income—significant tax efficiency for members.

🔄

Ongoing Compliance

Annual actuarial opinions, financial audits, regulatory filings, and board governance ensure the captive maintains compliance throughout its operational life.

Explore Further

Review the simulation results that underpin these compliance findings.